ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026
Closing the loop: Benefits and challenges of sharing clinical trial results with participants after trial close-out.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical trial participants have a right to know the results of the trials in which they participate. Trial results are often not shared directly with participants and concerns with privacy and resource constraints may prevent researchers from contacting participants after trial completion. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The objectives of this cross-sectional study were to explore the feasibility of contacting orthopaedic fracture trial participants after trial completion and to determine the preferences and priorities of the participants who wished to know the results. PATIENTS/
methodsFollowing the publication of the primary manuscript, we attempted to contact participants from the completed PREPARE trial at Hamilton Health Sciences to determine if they would like to know the trial results. We asked participants about their preferences for receiving trial results, their experiences upon learning them, and if they wished to learn which treatment they received.
resultsTwenty-eight percent (181/641) of PREPARE trial participants contacted agreed to participate in this study. We found that 95.5% (95% CI 91.0%-97.9%) of respondents wished to know the trial results and the preferred method was through viewing summary posters via an online link (78.2%; 95% CI 71.1%-84.0%). Most felt satisfied after learning the trial results (67.8%; 95% CI 59.5%- 75.2%) and 82.2% (95% CI 75.2%-87.5%) wanted to know which treatment they received. Fifty-one percent (95% CI 42.7%-58.7%) reported that learning the results increased their likelihood of participating in a future trial.
conclusionsAlthough it was challenging to both contact and re-engage participants after completing an orthopaedic trial that involved minimal participant burden, our study findings suggest that learning the trial results may have a positive impact on individual participants and the research community. Given the limited understanding of results among our respondents, researchers should have processes in place to engage participants meaningfully throughout the trial and proactively discuss with them how the results will be shared once the trial is complete. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.