ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Leveraging in-silico deep learning and computational analyses to predict the pathogenicity of ROBO4 variants of uncertain significance in aortic aneurysm and dissection patients.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in genes implicated in thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) present clinical challenges due to ambiguous pathogenicity and low patient representation. This study investigates the pathogenic potential of missense VUS in the ROBO4 gene, previously associated with vascular integrity and ascending aortic aneurysm. Clinical and genetic data from five patients with heterozygous ROBO4 VUS and thoracic aortic aneurysms or dissections were analyzed. Computational tools including AlphaFold2, AlphaMissense, REVEL, PolyPhen-2, SIFT, FATHMM, MutationTaster2, GranthamMatrix, and PhastCons were utilized to predict pathogenicity and structural impacts. Patients exhibited varying severities of aortic pathology, from elective aneurysm repairs to extensive familial aneurysmal histories. Structural modeling revealed significant differences in residue positions and biochemical properties, particularly for extracellular domain variants affecting critical beta-sheet structures involved in vascular stability. Notably, patient-specific predictions aligned computational evidence with clinical severity, suggesting potential genotype-phenotype correlations. For example, a variant (Q44P) showed strong pathogenic predictions coinciding with severe familial presentations. These computational predictions, validated by clinical data, highlight a novel and efficient workflow for evaluating VUS pathogenicity, informing precision medicine, and guiding counseling for aortic degenerative diseases. Ultimately, we demonstrate the value of integrating computational modeling with clinical data to decipher the pathogenic significance of genetic variants in cardiovascular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.