ArticleBMC nursing2026
Implementing gender-sensitive personalized nursing care into practice - a qualitative study with nurses from the cardiology units.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How gender-sensitive is nursing care in hospitals? Results of a national questionnaire survey in cardiology in Germany.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based gender-sensitive personalized nursing care (GSNC+) is considered in nursing expert standards and is the foundation for high-quality nursing care in Germany. However, the translation of GSNC+ into practice is still unknown. This qualitative study aims to identify implementation measures, facilitators, and barriers of GSNC + and to generate a nurse-focused definition of GSNC+. The overarching objective is to establish GSNC + as a foundational step toward personalized nursing care, focusing quality management on patient satisfaction.
methodsNine semi-structured focus group interviews and accompanying poster brainstorming were conducted with nurses from hospitals of the cardiology section (n = 46 nurses; 39 females, 7 males) in Germany. Audiotaped data were fully transcribed verbatim. Besides, posters were document analyzed. Two independent coders conducted the content analysis with MAXQDA using theory-based deductive themes and generated inductive subthemes.
resultsThe data were clustered into five major themes and 19 subthemes organized by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Based on the results a nurse-focused definition of GSNC + was developed, and facilitators, barriers, and implementation measures were identified. From nurses’ perspective, the following aspects are needed to implement GSNC + in hospitals: Further education, adequate working and organizational structure, less time pressure in daily patient care, supporting management, media/marketing, and awareness and positive attitude from stakeholders (politicians, population/caregivers, health insurance and professional associations).
conclusionEvidence-based content has been less included in the in-house standard operating procedures in practice and nurses implement GSNC+ mostly intuitive in patient care - quality aspects of patient care are neglected in the process. Disseminating such expert standards is not sufficient to bring about change in practice. A systematic strategy with adequate measures for quality management is needed to enhance evidence-based and high-quality GSNC+, as well as patients´ needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.