ArticleBMC medical education2026
Evaluation of the impact of student-led clinics on medical students' knowledge, skills, and professional growth.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Revolutionising healthcare access: student-led clinics as catalysts for change in an underserved urban community in Karachi, Pakistan.Journal of global health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStudent-led clinics (SLCs) are emerging as a significant model in medical education, offering practical experience in addressing healthcare challenges, especially in resource-limited settings. By bridging theoretical learning with practical experience, SLCs foster medical proficiency and deepen students’ understanding of healthcare disparities, social determinants of health, and patient-centred care. This study evaluates the impact of SLCs on the educational and professional development of medical students in Karachi, Pakistan.
methodsA cross-sectional pilot study was conducted from May 2023 to May 2024 involving 141 participants, including medical students and doctors, who volunteered at SLCs organized by the Humanity Initiative NGO. Data were collected via a self-administered questionnaire with a five-point Likert scale, focusing on three main themes: Community Service and Impact, Medical Knowledge and Skills Enhancement, and Patient-Centered Care and Communication. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 20.
resultsMost participants reported positive impacts of SLCs. High percentages agreed that SLCs provided vital community service (92.91%), enhanced medical knowledge (73.76%), and improved patient-centred care and communication skills (93.62%). Notably, medical students reported more significant benefits compared to medical graduates. Age and speciality influenced the perceived benefits, with younger participants and those interested in Pediatrics reporting higher gains. Significant correlations were found between community service, medical knowledge, and patient-centered care.
conclusionSLCs play a crucial role in bridging theoretical learning and practical application for medical students. They enhance medical knowledge, patient care skills, and understanding of healthcare delivery while fostering professional growth. These findings underscore the value of integrating SLCs into medical education to address healthcare disparities and prepare future healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.