Trial reportBMC cancer2026
SCANDARE: an institutional dynamic prospective interventional biobanking study.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03017573 (Prospective Biobanking Study in Cancer Patients Aiming at Better Understand the Link Between the Molecular Alterations of the Tumor Itself, Its Microenvironment and Immune Response), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Biobanking Study in Cancer Patients Aiming at Better Understand the Link Between the Molecular Alterations of the Tumor Itself, Its Microenvironment and Immune Response (SCANDARE)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-omics data integration using time-to event endpoint and supervised Cox penalized regression: a comprehensive review.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe set up a prospective longitudinal biobanking study answering scientific questions within a regulatory framework and patient-centered approach. We aim in this paper to present the opportunities of such a study, as well as the challenges and the limitations. PATIENTS AND
methodsSCANDARE (NCT03017573) is an institutional first monocentric then multicentric biobanking study. The study enrolled adult patients with newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, triple negative breast cancer, ovarian and cervical cancer. All patients signed a consent form before any procedure. Tumor tissue and blood samples are collected at several time points during patient's journey, including at diagnosis, post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in case of neoadjuvant treatment, at surgery, at recurrence and at disease progression following treatment initiated at recurrence. Clinical data are entered into an eCRF, whereas generated data are centralized in a secure database.
resultsSCANDARE started in 2017 at Institut Curie and has included 676 patients at date. SCANDARE successfully addressed challenges related to patient consent, regulatory compliance, and logistical integration of sample collection into routine clinical practice. The study facilitated the longitudinal collection and preservation of tumor and blood samples, enabling comprehensive analyses from histopathology to genomics and proteomics needed for the 35 ongoing projects run by academic research groups and industry. The implementation of optimized sampling and data workflows enabled high-quality data. Several other cohorts are planned to open soon.
conclusionSCANDARE is an institutional, prospective and dynamic biobanking study that successfully enabled the implementation of 35 research projects with clinical and omics data centralized in a secure database available for all collaborators on demand. Looking ahead, SCANDARE aims to expand its scope by including additional cancer types and patient cohorts, further enhancing the potential for translational research and personalized medicine in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.