ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Explainable machine learning model for predicting short-term outcomes in sepsis- induced coagulopathy.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Models for Mortality and Outcome Prediction in Intensive Care Unit Sepsis: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis-Induced coagulopathy (SIC) is not only a common complication in the development process of sepsis but also related to poor prognosis of sepsis. We aimed to establish a machine learning (ML) model to predict the 28-day mortality risk of patients with SIC.
methodsWe collected data for model training from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV Database version 2.2 to establish the model. We extracted patient data from the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University for the model's external validation. We used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and logistic regression analysis to identify predictive factors for a 28-day mortality risk. Then, we built prognostic prediction models for SIC patients using multiple ML classification models. We evaluated predictive performance using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). We used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to interpret the models.
resultsWe selected seventeen variables for model development, and the XGBoost model performed the best. The area under the curve (AUC) (95% CI) of the test set reached 0.840 (0.810-0.870), with an accuracy of 0.807, sensitivity of 0.836, and specificity of 0.798. The model also demonstrated excellent predictive performance in external validation, with an AUC (95% CI) of 0.864 (0.794-0.934).
conclusionWe constructed an XGBoost model and provided model interpretability using the SHAP. This model provides a basis for assessing the 28-day mortality risk of patients with SIC, aiding in clinical decision support and the formulation of personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.