SynthesisBMC public health2026
Association between PM
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmbient air pollution, particularly fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and hypertension, are compounding public health challenges in low- and middle-income countries, contributing millions of premature deaths annually. Although several studies have explored the relationship between ambient air pollution and blood pressure, evidence remains limited for young adults. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the magnitude of associations between PM2.5 exposure and blood pressure among young adults residing in Asia.
methodsPubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies published up to December 2024. Eligible studies reported associations between PM2.5 and blood pressure in populations aged 18–45 years. Data were extracted on study characteristics and effect estimates. Pooled mean changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) per 10 µg/m³ increase in PM2.5 were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity and study influence.
resultsOf 177 articles screened, 11 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, each 10 µg/m³ increase in PM2.5 was associated with a 1.13 mmHg rise in SBP (95% CI: 0.08–2.19) and a 0.38 mmHg rise in DBP (95% CI: − 0.18 to 0.94). Subgroup analysis indicated that long-term exposure was significantly associated with elevated DBP, suggesting a cumulative effect of prolonged PM2.5 exposure.
conclusionBoth short-term and long-term PM2.5 exposure was positively associated with blood pressure among young adults. These findings highlight novel evidence for overlooked population in previous reviews and underscore the need for targeted interventions and stricter air quality standards to protect cardiovascular health. As the evidence is primarily applicable to East Asian contexts, further research across other Asian regions is needed to establish broader generalizability.
trial registrationPROSPERO (Registration DOI: PROSPERO 2025 CRD42025642716).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.