ArticleBMC public health2026
Healthcare access barriers among deaf adolescents in nepal: a cross-sectional study to inform provider awareness.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence on healthcare access barriers among people with hearing loss in Nepal is limited, and research focusing specifically on Deaf adolescents is particularly scarce in low- and lower-middle-income countries. This study explored healthcare access barriers among Deaf adolescents whose primary mode of communication is sign language.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional convergent mixed-methods design was used. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected concurrently at Dhaulagiri Deaf Residential Secondary School in Baglung, the only secondary-level institution in Nepal enrolling Deaf students nationwide and offering a diploma in computer engineering. A total of 135 Deaf students from grade eight to the diploma level completed structured questionnaires. To obtain deeper insights from older adolescents with greater independent healthcare-seeking experience, 10% of diploma-level students were randomly selected for in-depth interviews using a lottery method. Both questionnaires and interviews assessed four categories of healthcare access barriers: structural, communication with healthcare providers (HCPs), HCP attitudes, and financial barriers.
resultsParticipants had a mean age of 19.9 years (SD 2.85); 70.4% were male, and 53.3% were enrolled in diploma programs. Most participants (90.4%) did not use assistive listening devices, and 74.1% reported congenital hearing loss. Structural barriers included long waiting times (64.4%) and transportation challenges (11.9%). Communication barriers were prominent, with only 25% reporting access to interpreters and just 37.8% finding communication with HCPs easy. Attitudinal barriers were also noted: only 31.1% perceived HCPs as friendly, 27.4% felt comfortable during consultations, and 15.6% reported mistreatment. Financial barriers included cost-related difficulties, limited awareness of health insurance (37%), and low insurance coverage (4.4%). Qualitative findings supported these results, highlighting difficulties understanding rapid speech, concerns about medications, and perceived gaps in HCP awareness of Deaf communication needs.
conclusionsCommunication challenges and negative provider attitudes were the most significant barriers to healthcare access among Deaf adolescents. By integrating quantitative and qualitative findings, this study provides new insights into the healthcare experiences of Deaf adolescents in Nepal and underscores the need for targeted deafness-awareness program for HCPs to improve accessibility and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.