ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Development and validation of a tool assessing adherence to warfarin therapy (TAAW) by Brazilian patients.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a tool assessing adherence to warfarin therapy (TAAW) by Brazilian patients.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo develop and validate a multidimensional tool to assess adherence to warfarin therapy by Brazilian patients.
methodsA Tool for Assessing Adherence to Warfarin Therapy (TAAW) was designed to encompass warfarin intake and other treatment-related aspects, including causal and effect items of adherence. The development process included: (i) construction of a concept map; (ii) elaboration of a preliminary version; (iii) expert assessment; (iv) semantic analysis through pre-testing with 30 participants; and (v) psychometric validation, including exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and hypothesis testing.
resultsOf the 35 initially drafted items, 14 were discarded and 19 modified, resulting in a final version with 21 items distributed across three dimensions: warfarin intake (n = 10), self-care associated with warfarin use (n = 7) and health monitoring (n = 4). The TAAW tool demonstrated a unidimensional structure, excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98), high test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.96) and strong correlation with the time in therapeutic range (Spearman's rho = 0.91), confirming its validity and reliability.
conclusionThe validated TAAW is a robust instrument for assessing adherence to warfarin therapy in clinical and research settings. Its comprehensive approach allows for the identification of adherence patterns, enabling healthcare professionals to implement targeted interventions and optimize anticoagulation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.