ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2026
The radiomics fingerprint of cartilage tumours: radiomics-based MRI differentiation of enchondroma and atypical cartilaginous tumour.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Giant cell tumor of the pubic bone with concomitant enchondroma: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models based on quantitative radiomics parameters extracted from T1-weighted MRI to differentiate enchondromas from atypical cartilaginous tumours (ACTs).
methodsA retrospective cohort comprising 66 patients (35 with histopathologically confirmed enchondroma and 31 with ACT) was included in the study. T1-weighted MRI images were used for 2D segmentation, performed independently by two experienced observers on all visible slices of each lesion. A comprehensive set of 107 radiomics features was extracted from these segmented regions of interest. LASSO regression was applied for dimensionality reduction. Four distinct machine learning algorithms-Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest Classifier (RFC), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Decision Tree Analysis-were trained and validated using a 70:30 data split.
resultsThe radiomics features demonstrated high inter- and intra-observer reproducibility. All evaluated machine learning models exhibited strong diagnostic performance, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.90. Specifically, SVM achieved an AUC of 0.922 (95% CI 0.893-0.951), RFC yielded an AUC of 0.920 (95% CI 0.881-0.963), and Decision Tree Analysis showed an AUC of 0.949 (95% CI 0.927-0.972). Notably, the XGBoost model achieved the highest diagnostic efficacy, boasting an impressive AUC of 0.987 (95% CI 0.976-0.999), coupled with a sensitivity of 89.35% and a specificity of 96.55%.
conclusionOur results indicate that the combination of MRI-based radiomics and machine learning algorithms, particularly XGBoost, offers a non-invasive and highly accurate method for distinguishing enchondroma from ACT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.