ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
AI-enhanced robotic hands: a breakthrough in early tumour detection and removal.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intelligent therapeutic robotic-assisted surgery as the next frontier of precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AI-enhanced robotic hands are rapidly reshaping tumour surgery by merging real-time sensing, precision mechanics, and intelligent decision support, yet current systems still struggle with early lesion detection, limited tactile sensitivity, and inconsistent accuracy across cancer types. This review addresses these gaps by examining how next-generation robotic hands, empowered by multimodal AI, augmented imaging, hybrid guidance, and minimally invasive mechatronics, can improve early tumour localization and safer resections. The study synthesizes insights from urologic, breast, colorectal, gastric, thoracic, and gynecologic oncology to highlight shared trends such as the shift toward personalized robotics, smart biopsy tools, light-mediated theranostics, flexible platforms, and real-time intraoperative analytics. A comparative reading of quantitative and qualitative evidence reveals strong gains in surgical precision and patient outcomes, yet also contradictions regarding cost-effectiveness, reproducibility of AI predictions, and disparity in adoption between high- and low-resource settings. Using a narrative review approach, key findings point to robotic hands with enhanced tactile sensors and AI-driven micro-maneuvering as promising breakthroughs for detecting microtumours, reducing positive margins, and guiding on-table diagnostics. Recommendations emphasize stronger clinical validation, interoperable imaging ecosystems, and ethical design. The implications extend to safer surgeries, shorter recovery, and more equitable cancer care. Limitations include heterogeneous study designs and early-stage prototypes. Future research should explore adaptive learning models, haptic-guided autonomy, and broader trials. Overall, AI-enhanced robotic hands signal a transformative pathway for earlier detection and more precise tumour removal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.