Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41639432›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2026

Neural population geometry and optimal coding of tasks with shared latent structure.

Albert J Wakhloo, Will Slatton, SueYeon Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Albert J WakhlooZuckerman Institute, Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Will SlattonCenter for Computational Neuroscience, Flatiron Institute, New York, NY, USA.
SueYeon ChungCenter for Computational Neuroscience, Flatiron Institute, New York, NY, USA. sueyeonchung@g.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5726-4865

Funding

Neurobiology and Behavior training grantT32MH126036 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Wesley B Grueber · 2020 to 2026
$2.5M
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Sloan Research FellowshipKlingenstein Third Generation Foundation (KTGF) Klingenstein-Simons AwardU.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) T32MH126036U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 5R90DA060339-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals can recognize latent structures in their environment and apply this information to efficiently navigate the world. Several works argue that the brain supports these abilities by forming neural representations from which behaviorally relevant variables can be read out across contexts and tasks. However, it is unclear which features of neural activity facilitate downstream readout. Here we analytically determine the geometric properties of neural activity that govern linear readout generalization on a set of tasks sharing a common latent structure. We show that four statistics summarizing the dimensionality, factorization and correlation structures of neural activity determine generalization. Early in learning, optimal neural representations are lower dimensional and exhibit higher correlations between single units and task variables than late in learning. We support these predictions through biological and artificial neural data analysis. Our results tie the linearly decodable information in neural population activity to its geometry.

Indexed as

BrainLearningModels, NeurologicalNeuronsAnimals

Identifiers

PMID41639432
PMCPMC12971491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.