Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41639425›Full record

ReviewExperimental & molecular medicine2026

Mechanotransduction through T cell receptors: consensus, controversies and future outlooks.

Stefano Travaglino, Yelim Jeon, Yihyung Kim, Cheng Zhu, Hyun-Kyu Choi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefano Travaglino *Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Yelim Jeon *Department of Biochemistry, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Yihyung Kim *Department of Biochemistry, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Cheng ZhuWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. cheng.zhu@bme.gatech.edu.
Hyun-Kyu ChoiDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea. hkchoi@yonsei.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9192-891X

Funding

Single-platelet analysis of mechano-reception by GPIb alphaR01HL132019 · NHLBI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ZHU, CHENG · 2016 to 2024
$3.8M
Exploiting the Mechanobiology of PD-1 for Cancer ImmunotherapyU01CA250040 · NCI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ZHU, CHENG · 2020 to 2024
$3.5M
T-cell intrinsic mechanisms of resistance to PD-1 checkpoint blockadeR01CA243486 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KROGSGAARD, MICHELLE, ZHU, CHENG · 2020 to 2024
$3.5M
Dysregulated mechanoimmunology of epigenetics-driven lymphomasU01CA280984 · NCI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Ankur Singh, Cheng Zhu · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
Optimizing TCR-CD3 signaling for immunotherapy of cancerR01CA284604 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MICHELLE KROGSGAARD, Cheng Zhu · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) RS-2024-00337196National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) RS-2024-00405542NCI NIH HHS R01 CA243486NCI NIH HHS R01 CA284604NCI NIH HHS U01 CA250040NCI NIH HHS U01 CA280984NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL132019U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01CA243486U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01CA284604U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01HL132019U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) U01CA250040U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) U01CA280984Yonsei University 2024-22-0036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune cells rely on surface immunoreceptors to sense their environment. While the downstream signaling pathways of many immunoreceptors are well characterized, the initial molecular events that trigger signaling upon ligand engagement remain incompletely understood. Here, in this Review, we outline our current understanding of this immunoreceptor signal initiation problem, using the T cell antigen receptor (TCR) as a prototype. We synthesize decades of research on the TCR's unique functional requirements and explore how these properties constrain potential triggering mechanisms. We evaluate prominent models of TCR signal initiation and highlight their respective strengths, limitations, complementary aspects and areas of ongoing debate. A central focus is the role of mechanical force in TCR triggering and antigen recognition for which we consider evidence for TCR-pMHC catch bonds, the capacity of T cells to generate endogenous forces and how these might modulate receptor-ligand kinetics and conformational changes to enhance antigen discrimination beyond classical kinetic proofreading models. By comparing TCR triggering with that of other immunoreceptors such as B cell receptors and Fc receptors, we discuss both shared principles and receptor-specific differences. This Review aims to consolidate current knowledge, reconcile conflicting findings and identify critical unanswered questions, in hopes of charting a path toward understanding how immunoreceptors convert ligand binding into cellular responses.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesAntigen PresentationHumansMajor Histocompatibility ComplexReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID41639425
PMCPMC12992811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.