ReviewExperimental & molecular medicine2026
Mechanotransduction through T cell receptors: consensus, controversies and future outlooks.
Review in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of T cell activation: Integrating signaling pathways, experimental models, and therapeutic implications.EXCLI journal · 2026Review
- Evaluating the effects of CD8/CD4 on T cell function in terms of TCR-pMHC-coreceptor catch and slip bonds.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Evaluating the effects of CD8/CD4 on T cell function in terms of TCR-pMHC-coreceptor catch and slip bonds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune cells rely on surface immunoreceptors to sense their environment. While the downstream signaling pathways of many immunoreceptors are well characterized, the initial molecular events that trigger signaling upon ligand engagement remain incompletely understood. Here, in this Review, we outline our current understanding of this immunoreceptor signal initiation problem, using the T cell antigen receptor (TCR) as a prototype. We synthesize decades of research on the TCR's unique functional requirements and explore how these properties constrain potential triggering mechanisms. We evaluate prominent models of TCR signal initiation and highlight their respective strengths, limitations, complementary aspects and areas of ongoing debate. A central focus is the role of mechanical force in TCR triggering and antigen recognition for which we consider evidence for TCR-pMHC catch bonds, the capacity of T cells to generate endogenous forces and how these might modulate receptor-ligand kinetics and conformational changes to enhance antigen discrimination beyond classical kinetic proofreading models. By comparing TCR triggering with that of other immunoreceptors such as B cell receptors and Fc receptors, we discuss both shared principles and receptor-specific differences. This Review aims to consolidate current knowledge, reconcile conflicting findings and identify critical unanswered questions, in hopes of charting a path toward understanding how immunoreceptors convert ligand binding into cellular responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.