Observational studySurgical endoscopy2026
Serial percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (SPEN) after initial VARD for necrotizing pancreatitis: a retrospective single-center observational study.
Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNecrotizing pancreatitis (NP), a severe form of acute pancreatitis (AP), is linked to lower survival rates. Treatment strategies have shifted towards less invasive, step-up approaches, favoring minimally invasive procedures. In this study, we report on the potential of combining the minimally invasive surgical approach with endoscopic necrosectomy as a novel treatment strategy, termed serial percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (SPEN), for patients with therapy-refractory NP. MATERIAL AND
methodsA cohort of 19 patients suffering from therapy-refractory NP, defined as persistent necroses after drainage treatment and subsequent video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD), was treated with SPEN upon failure of the above stated. In contrast to surgery, SPEN does not require general anesthesia or an operating theater. The results were compared with the current data on alternative treatments.
resultsThe investigated cohort consisted of severely ill patients as most patients experienced organ failure as well as severe disease progression in need of intensive-care unit admission. SPEN was performed 4.3 ± 3.8 times, ranging from 1 to 14 procedures per individual. According to the current Clavien-Dindo classification, only "mild" and no major SPEN procedure-associated complications can be observed.
conclusionIn this report, we present our experience with a novel treatment approach combining surgery and endoscopic interventions for the treatment of NP. While sparing resources, SPEN was shown to be safe and effective. Favorable implications are implied owing to the combination of the best of two worlds: surgery, with its capacity for extensive necrosectomy and endoscopic necrosectomy, which is valued for its applicability as a flexible, low-grade invasive but effective tool that may be dynamically employed depending on individual disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.