ReviewNature genetics2026
Sharing approaches in predictive genomics across animals, plants and humans.
Review in Nature genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- PGS-GS: a framework integrating polygenic scores and genomic selection in animal breeding.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Integrating deep learning and pangenomics to recover missing heritability from wild structural variations.BMC genomics · 2026Review
- Development and application of a 10 K low-density whole-genome SNP array for chickens.Poultry science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic prediction has become central to human, animal and plant biology, enabling quantitative inference of how genetic variation shapes complex traits. Although these domains share statistical foundations, such as linear mixed models, Bayesian regression and deep-learning frameworks, they have advanced largely in parallel. Here we synthesize their methodological evolution and highlight opportunities for integration and deeper collaborations. Agricultural genetics contributed to the mixed-model and Bayesian frameworks underlying modern polygenic scores, while human genomics has driven advances in nonlinear modeling, federated learning and biology-informed artificial intelligence. We propose a roadmap centered on interoperable data standards, shared benchmarks and cross-disciplinary training to unify predictive genomics across species. Together, these efforts establish genomic prediction as a comparative science capable of explaining how genetic information drives form and function across the diversity of life. We emphasize that shared biological architectures and knowledge transfer across species can directly improve the robustness, interpretability and generalizability of predictive models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41639408What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.