Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41639408›Full record

ReviewNature genetics2026

Sharing approaches in predictive genomics across animals, plants and humans.

Saranya Arirangan, Leticia F de Oliveira, Md Nazmul Hasan, Autumn B Sherman, Mitchell Tuinstra, Luiz F Brito, Robbee Wedow, Matthew Tegtmeyer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saranya AriranganDepartment of Sociology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Leticia F de OliveiraDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Md Nazmul HasanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6672-5886
Autumn B ShermanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Mitchell TuinstraDepartment of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Luiz F BritoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Robbee WedowDepartment of Sociology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3108-7087
Matthew TegtmeyerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. mttegtme@purdue.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9032-8207

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic prediction has become central to human, animal and plant biology, enabling quantitative inference of how genetic variation shapes complex traits. Although these domains share statistical foundations, such as linear mixed models, Bayesian regression and deep-learning frameworks, they have advanced largely in parallel. Here we synthesize their methodological evolution and highlight opportunities for integration and deeper collaborations. Agricultural genetics contributed to the mixed-model and Bayesian frameworks underlying modern polygenic scores, while human genomics has driven advances in nonlinear modeling, federated learning and biology-informed artificial intelligence. We propose a roadmap centered on interoperable data standards, shared benchmarks and cross-disciplinary training to unify predictive genomics across species. Together, these efforts establish genomic prediction as a comparative science capable of explaining how genetic information drives form and function across the diversity of life. We emphasize that shared biological architectures and knowledge transfer across species can directly improve the robustness, interpretability and generalizability of predictive models.

Indexed as

GenomicsPlantsAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceBayes TheoremFederated LearningGenetic VariationHumansModels, GeneticPrediction Algorithms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.