Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41639399›Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026

Medical Gaslighting and its Impact on Vulnerable Populations.

Kryss Shane, Anthony D Slonim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kryss ShaneThomas University, Thomasville, GA, USA.
Anthony D SlonimDepartments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Carilion Clinic Roanoke, Virginia and Medicine, Pediatrics, Health Systems Science and Interprofessional Practice, Virginia Tech-Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA. adslonim@carilionclinic.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical gaslighting, defined as the minimization or dismissal of a patient's symptoms by healthcare providers, has gained increasing visibility, particularly among marginalized populations. This phenomenon disproportionately impacts individuals facing systemic inequities related to race, gender and class, effects that are compounded at the intersection of these identities. Medical gaslighting contributes to misdiagnosis, delayed care, emotional distress, and long-term mistrust in healthcare systems. Through an intersectional framework and illustrative case studies, this paper examines how implicit bias, structural racism, and the historical mistreatment of marginalized groups contribute to the erasure of patient experiences. The emotional and psychological toll of medical gaslighting further exacerbates existing health disparities. To address this issue, we explore strategies including provider education on implicit bias, expanded patient advocacy, and policy reforms aimed at promoting health equity. These interventions are critical for restoring trust and improving health outcomes, particularly for those most vulnerable to systemic healthcare neglect.

Indexed as

Gender disparitiesMedical gaslightingRacial and ethnic disparities

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.