ArticleBehavior research methods2026
The Chameleon Paradigm: An effective method for masking biological motion stimuli.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Continuous flash suppression (CFS) is widely used in research on unconscious visual processing due to its long-lasting masking. While CFS effectively masks static stimuli, its application to motion stimuli remains challenging. To resolve this issue, our previous work developed the Chameleon-1 paradigm (Zhao & Bao, 2022), an enhanced CFS technique that enables robust masking of translational motion stimuli for up to 10 s through precise spatiotemporal matching of color dynamics between target and masking stimuli. The current study systematically evaluated and optimized this paradigm through three studies. We first assessed the masking efficacy of the Chameleon-1 paradigm across different motion parameters and patterns (Study 1). Because Chameleon-1 failed to effectively mask biological motion (BM) stimuli, we then upgraded the paradigm to accommodate BM stimulus characteristics (Study 2). The results demonstrated that this Chameleon-2 paradigm achieved superior masking efficacy for BM stimuli, with average breakthrough time extended by over two-fold compared to Chameleon-1 and breakthrough ratios approximately 75% for upright and 45% for inverted BM stimuli during 10-s of BM presentation. We further employed this paradigm to investigate the neural correlates of conscious and unconscious BM processing using functional near-infrared spectroscopy in Study 3. Our work establishes a robust paradigm for sustained masking of BM stimuli and validates its utility in unconscious processing research. We also provide new insights into the neural mechanisms underlying unconscious BM perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41639394What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.