ArticleJournal of cardiovascular translational research2026
In Vitro Assessment of Coronary Perfusion after Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in a High-Risk Patient-Specific Experimental Model.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation (VIV-TAVI) carries a high mortality risk. This in-vitro study assessed coronary perfusion in a high-risk VIV-TAVI scenario. A patient deemed at high-risk and treated with preventive Chimney stenting was selected as case study. A 3D-printed aortic root model was fabricated from pre-operative imaging and used to replicate the patient's VIV-TAVI setting. A CoreValve-Evolut-23 was implanted within a Trifecta-19 at five depths, with commissural alignment and 60° misalignment, to explore procedural variability and associated risk margins. The model was tested in a pulsatile mock loop with a coronary perfusion simulator. Flow and pressure were recorded pre- and post-VIV-TAVI under physiological conditions. Across all tested configurations, VIV-TAVI didn't significantly impair left or right coronary flows. The recommended depth optimized hemodynamic valve performance. Findings suggest refining coronary obstruction risk stratification in VIV-TAVI to improve decision-making regarding preventive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41639362What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.