Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41639330›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Elevation uncertainties in the Mekong Delta quantified using a transferable approach.

Katharina Seeger, Philip S J Minderhoud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katharina SeegerSoil Geography and Landscape Group , Wageningen University & Research , NL-6708PB, Wageningen, Netherlands. katharina.seeger@wur.nl.
Philip S J MinderhoudSoil Geography and Landscape Group , Wageningen University & Research , NL-6708PB, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek NWO-Veni-TTW-2022 No. 20231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The elevation of coastal lowlands relative to local sea level is a crucial determinant for their exposure and is key input for coastal hazard and relative sea-level rise impact assessments. For many data-sparse coastal lowlands worldwide, global digital elevation models are often the only source of information. While these provide an adequate spatial (i.e. horizontal) resolution for regional, delta-wide coastal assessments, their vertical errors in the range of several metres impede investigations of (relative) sea-level rise impact where changes occur on millimetre- to centimetre-scale. Assessing the quality of available elevation datasets is required to identify the best performing model(s) to use for generating reliable coastal impact and exposure assessments. While data-intrinsic inaccuracy has been extensively addressed both in dataset documentation and literature, the relevance and proper vertical datum conversion from global geoid and ellipsoid to local sea level is often still omitted in many applied studies from coastal research. Similarly, the impact of the actuality of elevation data (i.e. time since data acquisition) on assessments in coastal lowlands is so far understudied although elevation models may become quickly outdated, especially where coastal lowlands are facing high rates of elevation change resulting from the interplay of vertical land motion, (vertical) sediment accretion and sea-level change. Particularly for flat, low-lying subsiding coastal landscapes like the Mekong Delta, being in parts only a few decimetres elevated above sea level and experiencing land subsidence of up to several centimetres per year, the reliability of elevation data and adequate representation of elevation relative to local sea level as well as the consideration of factors impacting elevation over time is of utmost importance. We present a transferable and ultimately globally applicable approach to quantify and attribute uncertainties in elevation assessment for data-sparse coastal lowlands using global elevation models to sources such as inaccuracy, vertical datum offset and actuality. The approach combines openly available land elevation and sea-level datasets, integrated with non-linear time series and projections of sea-level change and vertical land motion while also pointing out the need of information on sediment accretion/erosion. We showcase this approach by revisiting land elevation in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta (i) by vertically referencing 11 commonly used global elevation models and an updated local elevation model to a common actual, local sea-level datum, and (ii) by conducting a thorough assessment of elevation model performance that not only allows for the quantification of errors and elevation assessment uncertainties but also their attribution to data-intrinsic inaccuracy, vertical datum offset and, tentatively, non-linear impact of elevation change due to vertical land motion (e.g. extraction-induced land subsidence) and sea-level change affecting the actuality of the elevation model. Our approach not only allows to improve the understanding of coastal elevation to further improve relative sea-level rise and flood impact assessments and to substantiate projections of future elevation in the Mekong Delta, but in its design, applying solely open data and commonly used GIS software, facilitates similar assessments of elevation model performance and elevation assessment uncertainties in other (data-sparse) coastal regions in the world.

Indexed as

Digital elevation model (DEM)Land elevation changeLand subsidenceRelative sea-level riseSatellite dataVertical datum

Identifiers

PMID41639330
PMCPMC12876989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.