ArticleScientific reports2026
Types and frequency of preanalytical errors occurring in the hematology laboratory at Debre Tabor comprehensive specialized hospital, North Central, Ethiopia, 2025.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Educational strategies for enhancing medical students' competency in laboratory medicine practice: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed the types and frequency of pre-analytical errors in the hematology laboratory at Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, recognizing that such errors are most common in the pre-analytical phase, significantly affecting laboratory results, which influence 60–70% of clinical decisions. A cross-sectional study was conducted at the hematology laboratory of Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from March 1 to April 30, 2025. All hematology test requests and blood samples received during routine hours were included. Pre-analytical errors were assessed using a checklist, and data were verified before entry into Epi-Data version 4.0. Analysis was carried out using STATA version 14, focusing on descriptive statistics, such as frequency and percentage. A total of 2,221 blood samples and their request forms were reviewed, with 50.11% from the inpatient department and 49.89% from the outpatient department. Only 19.45% of the forms contained complete data. While patients’ names and laboratory tests were included, critical information such as diagnosis (20.08%), date of request (8.46%), and patient age (7.16%) was missed. Additionally, 5.4% of samples were of poor quality, mainly due to insufficient volume (1.35%) and unlabeled samples (1.22%). Pre-analytical errors remain a major challenge in laboratory medicine, largely due to human factors in test requests, specimen collection, transport, and processing. In the hematology lab, 80.55% of requisition forms contained errors, while 5.4% of specimens were inadequate for analysis. Reducing these errors requires better ward–laboratory communication, the adoption of laboratory information systems, and continuous staff training with competency assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.