ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhancing diagnostic safety with low iodine, low radiation CTPA classification using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition for which computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the standard diagnostic modality. However, conventional CTPA protocols require relatively high iodine contrast and radiation doses, raising concerns about renal injury and radiation exposure. In this study, we propose a deep learning-based framework for PE diagnosis under low-iodine and low-radiation CTPA conditions. The proposed two-stage framework integrates image enhancement and classification by jointly leveraging original low-exposure images and their super-resolved counterparts. We further construct and publicly release a low-iodine, low-radiation CTPA dataset developed in collaboration with a clinical institution to support reproducible research in safe imaging. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method substantially improves diagnostic performance compared with single-branch baselines, achieving an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.928 while maintaining balanced sensitivity and specificity. These findings suggest that the proposed framework enables accurate and safer PE diagnosis under reduced contrast and radiation exposure, offering a practical solution for improving diagnostic safety in clinical CTPA imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.