ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model for the identification of obstructive hydrocephalus on computed tomography of the head.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in acute hydrocephalus: Narrowing the diagnostic gap.European radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveObstructive hydrocephalus is a critical radiographic finding requiring emergent treatment. Its identification on head CT by an AI model could facilitate sooner life-saving interventions, although there are common co-occurring findings, including intracranial hemorrhage, that can confound this interpretation. This external validation assessed the accuracy of an AI model at identifying obstructive hydrocephalus, including in the presence or absence of other findings. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective cohort included 177 thin (≤ 1.5 mm) series and 194 thick (> 1.5 and ≤ 5 mm) series from 200 non-contrast head CT cases. These cases were obtained from patients aged ≥ 18 years at 5 hospitals in the United States. Each case was interpreted independently by up to three neuroradiologists. Each series was then interpreted by the AI model.
resultsThe AI model performed with an area under the curve of 0.988 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.971-0.998) on thin series and 0.986 (95% CI: 0.969-0.997) on thick series. These results were broadly maintained in subgroups for the presence or absence of intracranial hemorrhage, parenchymal abnormality, and ventricular drain, and across demographic and scanner manufacturer subgroups.
conclusionsThe AI model accurately identified obstructive hydrocephalus in this dataset. Its performance in subgroup analyses reflected its robustness. KEY POINTS: Question Can an artificial intelligence model accurately identify obstructive hydrocephalus on head computed tomography, including in the presence or absence of common co-occurring imaging findings? Findings This model accurately identified obstructive hydrocephalus on thin and thick series, including in the presence or absence of intracranial hemorrhage, parenchymal abnormality, and ventricular drain. Clinical relevance This model could assist with triaging abnormal cases, enabling earlier identification and management of obstructive hydrocephalus. Its maintained performance with or without co-occurring findings suggests it specifically identifies obstructive hydrocephalus rather than these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41639307What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.