Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41639297›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Statistical downscaling reproduces high-resolution ocean transport for particle tracking in the Bering Sea.

Trond Kristiansen, Jordan Miller, Momme Butenschön

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Trond KristiansenFarallon Institute, Petaluma, CA, USA. trondkr@faralloninstitute.org.
Jordan MillerActea Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Momme ButenschönCMCC Foundation - Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme No 101060072 (ACTNOW)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding ocean transport is critical for applications ranging from fisheries to chemical plume tracking and carbon dioxide removal modeling. However, available hydrodynamic data often lack the spatial resolution needed for effective transport simulations. We apply statistical downscaling to coarse-resolution ocean reanalysis and atmospheric wind data, reconstructing fine-scale fields validated against high-resolution dynamic models in the Bering Sea. This enables the prediction of transport patterns without the need to run high resolution physics simulations, saving computational costs and time. We examined five years of high-resolution, statistically downscaled ocean currents and surface winds and found that the correlation of ocean current and wind components with GLORYS and ERA5 reanalysis models were r = 0.87 and r = 0.98. The Liu-mean skill score was 0.75 for ocean current velocity. Okubo-Weiss analyses showed comparable vorticity and shear between downscaled and dynamical models. The Finite-time Layupanov Exponent analysis showed consistent Lagrangian Cohesive Structures across datasets. Multi-year particle tracking using both downscaled and reanalysis forcing showed consistent relative separation distances with mean Bhattacharyya coefficient of 0.720 ± 0.133. The demonstrated parity in dispersal patterns indicates statistically downscaled approaches can substitute dynamical models for large-scale applications. Future work should validate these results across diverse oceanographic regimes and incorporate biogeochemical feedback mechanisms.

Indexed as

Bering Sea ocean currentsLagrangian particle trackingMesoscale ocean dynamicsOcean reanalysisStatistical downscaling

Identifiers

PMID41639297
PMCPMC12923551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.