ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative analysis of supervised and ensemble models with unsupervised exploration for alzheimer's disease prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-enabled chemical ecology for integrated pest management: from volatiles to field applications.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by memory loss and cognitive decline, with no known cure. Early detection of dementia, a primary manifestation of Alzheimer's disease, is critical to enable timely intervention and treatment planning. This study introduces ensemble learning models for predicting Alzheimer's disease and presents a comparative analysis between traditional machine learning and advanced ensemble models. The evaluation is conducted using the "Open Access Series of Imaging Studies" 2 (OASIS-2) dataset. Traditional models, including logistic regression, decision tree, support vector machine, and random forest, are benchmarked against ensemble models such as adaptive boosting, extreme gradient boosting, and a hyperparameter-tuned majority voting ensemble models. Performance is assessed using accuracy, precision, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results show that ensemble models, particularly the optimized majority voting classifier, consistently outperform traditional methods. To complement the supervised comparison, exploratory unsupervised methods were applied using multiple correspondence analysis and k-means clustering to uncover latent structures in the dataset. By categorizing all variables, these unsupervised methods highlight patterns of clinical and demographic similarity. Unlike prior studies that focus solely on predictive accuracy, this work integrates supervised classification, ensemble learning, and unsupervised exploratory analysis within a unified framework. This combined approach enables both robust performance comparison and deeper insights into latent data structures relevant to Alzheimer's disease. All computational experiments were conducted using the Python programming language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.