ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
The effect of umbilical cord coiling ındex measured in antenatal period on pregnancy results.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the association between ultrasonographically measured umbilical coiling index (UCI) at 18-24 weeks of gestation and adverse perinatal outcomes in primigravid pregnancies.
methodsThis prospective study included 461 primigravid women with singleton pregnancies. UCI was measured at 3 cord segments and classified as hypocoiled (< 0.20), normocoiled (0.20-0.40), or hypercoiled (> 0.40) using percentile distribution and ROC-derived thresholds. Maternal characteristics, delivery outcomes, fetal well-being, placental measurements, cord blood gas values, and neonatal outcomes were compared using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and chi-square tests (p < 0.05 was significant).
resultsOf the 461 patients, 72 (15.6%) were hypocoiled, 244 (52.9%) normocoiled, and 145 (31.5%) hypercoiled. No significant differences were found in maternal age, BMI, gestational age at delivery, hypertension, diabetes, or placental abruption. Birth weight was lowest in the hypocoiled group (p < 0.001). Umbilical artery pH was significantly lower in the hypercoiled group (p < 0.001). Both hypo and hypercoiled groups showed significantly reduced placental weight/thickness (p < 0.001) and higher rates of non-reassuring non-stress tests (34.7 and 28.3% vs. 9.0%, p < 0.001). Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (p = 0.003), oligohydramnios (p < 0.001), and intrauterine growth restriction (p < 0.001) were more common in abnormal coiling groups. Five-minute Apgar scores were significantly lower in both abnormal groups (p < 0.001). No association was found with fetal death (p = 0.575).
conclusionBoth decreased and excessive umbilical cord coiling in the second trimester are associated with impaired fetal growth and adverse perinatal outcomes. Routine second-trimester UCI assessment may help identify high-risk pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.