ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and validation of a simple nomogram for predicting knee osteoarthritis using movement evoked pain in a community setting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a clinical disease with a high incidence rate. Early identification and treatment of KOA are of great significance. This study aims to establish a predictive model using the movement-evoked pain (MEP) test for the early diagnosis of KOA. From May to December 2018, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among 3374 residents from 12 communities in Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province. Data collection included general demographic information, the MEP test and treatment history. The data set was randomly divided into training set and validation set at a ratio of 7:3 by computer randomization. We analyzed the prevalence of KOA based on imaging and determined the influencing factors using logistic regression. Based on these factors, we constructed a nomogram and conducted validation. Among the 6748 knees analyzed, 78.4% were diagnosed with KOA based on imaging (KL grade ≥ 2). From 13 initial variables, we identified 9 independent predictors for the nomogram: age, exercise habits, pain during squatting, stair climbing, and housework, maximum pain, and history of oral NSAIDs, physical therapy, or intra-articular injections. A nomogram was developed based on these variables. The Area Under the Curve of the training set and validation set in the model were 0.889 (95% CI: 0.878-0.902) and 0.878 (95% CI: 0.859-0.898), respectively. The Brier score of the calibration curve was 0.127 and 0.131, respectively. The decision curve showed that it could increase the net clinical benefit within the risk threshold range of 20-80%. The MEP test enables imaging-independent KOA risk stratification, offering a feasible decision-support tool for primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.