ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Cross-sectional survey among professionals on communication and mental health care for asylum seeking and refugee minors in Germany.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundForced displacement and migration are on the rise worldwide. Asylum seeking and refugee minors (ASRM) are particularly exposed to risk factors for mental health problems. Yet, there is a lack of comprehensive data on the prevalence of specific mental health problems as well as applied screening and follow-up care in Germany.
methodsUsing the online platform REDCap, we conducted the cross-sectional SAVE-KID survey among health and social care professionals (HSCP) working with ASRM in Germany (n = 201; 44% medical doctors, 38% social workers) to assess the estimated mental health burden among ASRM, the conducted screening measures, and provided mental health care as well as the extent to which communication problems affect care for ASRM.
resultsHere we show, that on average, 21% of ASRM are reported with one or more listed mental health problem. Only 37% receive follow-up. Less than 24% of participants conduct mental health screening by informal questions, interviews, trained staff or questionnaires. 84% of participants report frequent communication problems. Most used aids are online tools or relatives' translations.
conclusionsSAVE-KID describes an imbalance between the occurrence of and screening for mental health problems among ASRM. Comprehensive, systematic detection of mental health problems remains challenging due to communication problems, lack of specialized staff and diagnostic tools as well as follow-up care structures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.