ArticleScientific reports2026
Interpretable machine-learning risk prediction of unplanned extubation among cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unplanned extubation of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC-UE) in patients with cancer has been linked to factors including women, diabetes, thrombosis history, valved catheter, double-lumen catheter, and self-management. However, the effect of patient quality of life has not been explored. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze PICC-UE risk factors using a machine-learning algorithm, focusing on the role of patient quality of life. A total of 212 cancer patients who underwent PICC catheterization were included in this study from February 2021 to June 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups based on PICC-UE occurrence: the PICC-UE group (n = 23) and the non-PICC-UE group (n = 189). Referring to previous reports and professional cognition, data of 30 potential risk factors within one week before extubation were collected, with a focus on incorporating health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and patient self-management scores. PICC-UE risk factors were examined using four machine-learning algorithms with three encoding methods and four data imbalance processing methods. Then, the key factors causing PICC-UE were interpreted using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) tool. PICC-UE occurred in 23 of 212 patients (overall incidence: 10.8%). The HRQOL score, which has been underexplored in prior studies, demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the PICC-UE and non-PICC-UE groups (P < 0.001) and exhibited a strong association with patient self-management score, as evidenced by its concentration in the upper right quadrant of the planar scatter plot. As a novel derivative composite metric, weighted quality of life (WQOL), calculated as the product of HRQOL and self-management scores, was identified as the most influential risk factor for PICC-UE, surpassing both individual self-management and HRQOL scores (SHAP-value = 1.02 vs. 0.22 and 0.00). Furthermore, increased upper arm circumference was also found to be a significant predictor (SHAP value = 0.22). This study demonstrates the synergistic effect of patients' quality of life and self-management capacity on the PICC-UE occurrence. The WQOL metric, which integrates both factors, serves as a significant predictor of PICC-UE occurrence and should therefore be considered an essential component in clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.