ArticleScientific reports2026
Consolidation behaviour of AZ80 magnesium chips: influence of compaction pressure and holding time on porosity, interfaces and mechanical response.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Solid-state recycling of magnesium alloys relies on effective pre-compaction to convert loose machining chips into dense precursors suitable for downstream processing. This study investigates the consolidation mechanisms of AZ80 Mg chips containing residual water-based lubricants, compacted in a single-action hydraulic press without prior cleaning. The compaction pressure, holding time, and pressure evolution were analyzed to determine their influence on briquette quality. The findings demonstrated that holding time, rather than peak pressure, was the governing factor for densification. Extended holding promoted internal stress redistribution and geometric adaptation, facilitating pore collapse and yielding green densities of ~ 91-92% with uniform axial distribution, while short holding times limited effective stress transmission, resulting in heterogeneous density gradients. Microstructural analysis revealed that while native oxide barriers persisted, preventing full metallurgical bonding, extended holding achieved sub-micron interfacial spacing and effective geometric closure. Hardness mapping indicated that shorter holding times retained higher hardness values (~ 110-116 HV), consistent with high localized work hardening and incomplete stress redistribution. In addition, compression tests revealed that stiffness was governed by interfacial integrity rather than bulk density. Therefore, samples with superior geometric sealing exhibited significantly higher stiffness (2964 MPa) compared to denser samples with poorer interfacial locking. These results indicate that optimizing interfacial contact through load maintenance is critical for producing stable briquettes, providing a pathway for robust solid-state recycling of AZ80 alloys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.