ArticleScientific reports2026
Gene variants in the pheromone vomeronasal receptors and QTLs around behavioral and fat metabolism genes associated with altered feed efficiency in cattle.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Improving feed efficiency in cattle is increasingly important for both environmental and economic reasons. Although feed efficiency traits are under considerable genetic control, with an average moderate heritability estimate of 0.33, genetic evaluations are limited by the difficulties in measuring feed intake and the lack of records from most commercial herds. Most genetic evaluations rely on small numbers of records from research farms, resulting in under-represented genetic variation and pronounced sampling errors in heritability estimates. To enhance the discovery of genetic mechanisms underlying feed efficiency and to address measurement limitations and the under-representation of genetic variation, we used joint phenotypic and genotypic measurements from two distinct herds for GWAS and in-depth genomic analysis. By applying this approach, our exploratory analysis discovered fourteen significant markers with effects on residual feed intake (RFI) ranging from -1.41 to 1.44 kg/day. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) enrichment analysis specifically pointed to traits that contributed to RFI, including dry matter intake (DMI), body weight (BW), and protein yield. Gene enrichment analysis, which was largely biased by a local cluster of vomeronasal receptor genes within a single ~ 500 kb region on BTA18, suggested three sets of genes of interest: a vomeronasal pheromone receptor cluster (VN1R1 and four additional response to pheromone genes on BTA18), genes linked to social and behavioral responses (EPC2 on BTA2; SYN3 on BTA5), and fat metabolism-related genes (KIF5C on BTA2; SV2B on BTA21). Of these candidate genes, likely functional amino acid (AA) variations were observed in the VN1R1 putative protein (314 AA) after screening a sample of 27 Israeli Holstein genomes. These functional variations included two truncation mutations that could encode 89 and 239 AA polypeptides. Consistent with these findings, whole-genome sequence data analysis of RFI-characterized Irish bulls identified a significant association between the 89 AA truncation and high RFI, further validating our results and indicating that although such variation was common, the presence of an intact VN1R1 receptor was associated with a beneficial effect on feed efficiency. Moreover, the 89 AA truncation was observed in diverse cattle breeds, including American, Israeli, Irish, and New Zealand Holstein. These findings are compatible with feed efficiency, a complex trait governed by neural (behavioral) and metabolic components. Further characterization of these factors would allow genetic selection to reduce feed costs and environmental footprints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.