Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41639237›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Validation of socialbit as a smartwatch algorithm for social interaction detection in a clinical population.

Amar Dhand, Samuel Tate, Cade Mack, Sofia Carozza, David Farynyk, Mehdi Bourahla, Oluwamayomikun Adeboye, Grace Cooke, Olivia Berglund, Riya Dahima and 10 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Amar DhandDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. adhand@bwh.harvard.edu.
Samuel TateDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.
Cade MackDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.
Sofia CarozzaDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
David FarynykDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.
Mehdi BourahlaDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.
Oluwamayomikun AdeboyeDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Grace CookeDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Olivia BerglundDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Riya DahimaDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Melinda LuoDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Vrushali DhongadeDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
George S UsmanovDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Kelly WhiteDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Amanda M BernalDepartment of Psychology, College of Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Ross ZafonteDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, 02129, USA.
Shrikanth NarayananMing Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Minwoo LeeDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.
Matthias R MehlDepartment of Psychology, College of Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Min ShinDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.

Funding

SocialBit: Establishing the accuracy of a wearable sensor to detect social interactions after strokeR01HD099176 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI DHAND, AMAR · 2020 to 2025
$2.8M
National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research R01HD099176NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD099176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social interaction supports brain health and recovery after neurological injury. Yet no validated tool exists for real-time measurement in individuals with and without neurological deficits. We developed SocialBit, a lightweight, privacy-preserving machine learning algorithm that detects social interactions using ambient audio features on a commercial smartwatch. In a prospective validation study, we evaluated SocialBit against livestream minute-by-minute human-coded ground truth in 153 hospitalized stroke patients who wore the device for up to 8 days, generating 88,918 min of observation. In these patients, the stroke severity and cognition spanned broad clinical ranges (NIH Stroke Scale 0-25; Montreal Cognitive Assessment 8-30), and 24 patients had aphasia across diverse subtypes, including severe presentations. SocialBit achieved high overall performance (sensitivity 0.87, specificity 0.88, area under the curve 0.94) and maintained accuracy in patients with language deficits (AUC 0.93). Despite lower temporal sampling, SocialBit produced interaction frequency distributions closely matching minute-by-minute human coding. Performance was robust across environments and interaction types. Of clinical relevance, SocialBit showed that patients with more severe strokes engaged in less social interaction, paralleling human-coded results. SocialBit is an accurate digital biomarker of social interaction with potential applications in remote monitoring and clinical trials.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSocial InteractionStrokeAgedDigital HealthFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41639237
PMCPMC12873288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.