ArticleScientific reports2026
Validation of socialbit as a smartwatch algorithm for social interaction detection in a clinical population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social interaction supports brain health and recovery after neurological injury. Yet no validated tool exists for real-time measurement in individuals with and without neurological deficits. We developed SocialBit, a lightweight, privacy-preserving machine learning algorithm that detects social interactions using ambient audio features on a commercial smartwatch. In a prospective validation study, we evaluated SocialBit against livestream minute-by-minute human-coded ground truth in 153 hospitalized stroke patients who wore the device for up to 8 days, generating 88,918 min of observation. In these patients, the stroke severity and cognition spanned broad clinical ranges (NIH Stroke Scale 0-25; Montreal Cognitive Assessment 8-30), and 24 patients had aphasia across diverse subtypes, including severe presentations. SocialBit achieved high overall performance (sensitivity 0.87, specificity 0.88, area under the curve 0.94) and maintained accuracy in patients with language deficits (AUC 0.93). Despite lower temporal sampling, SocialBit produced interaction frequency distributions closely matching minute-by-minute human coding. Performance was robust across environments and interaction types. Of clinical relevance, SocialBit showed that patients with more severe strokes engaged in less social interaction, paralleling human-coded results. SocialBit is an accurate digital biomarker of social interaction with potential applications in remote monitoring and clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.