ArticleScientific reports2026
Sustainable and interpretable heart disease prediction: a clinical decision support approach for biomedical healthcare applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disorders cause approximately 18 million deaths annually worldwide, underscoring the urgent need for precise and rapid diagnosis. Conventional machine learning does not automate feature extraction and does not capture complex non-linear relationships in high-dimensional medical data during cardiodiagnostic predictions, not to mention current techniques also lack interpretability and transparency and thus are not useful for building clinically trusted AI-powered prediction tools for personalized biomedicine and healthcare. To fill this gap, we propose an interpretable Convolutional Neural Network (1D CNN) model for cardiodiagnostic predictions that integrates automated feature extraction and explains AI. Our approach uses a 1D CNN model composed of two convolutional layers (with 64 and 128 filters). The CNN will be trained on Cleveland Heart Disease Dataset (Kaggle) (303 instances, 14 attributes) and will undergo evaluation using accuracy, precision, recall , F1 score, and LIME-SHAP interpretability analyses. The results given attest to the remarkable results, where the model achieved 98.05% percent accuracy, 100% percent precision, 96.12% percent recall, 98.02% percent F1 score, 0.963 MCC, and 0.961 Kappa coefficient. Our results exceed several of the more modern techniques offered in the literature. LIME and SHAP analyses reveal how specific features (sex, number of major vessels, thalassemia status) drive model predictions, enhancing interpretability and aligning with clinical understanding of cardiac risk factors essential for precision medicine. This research demonstrates the potential for interpretable deep learning to transform cardiovascular diagnostics through enhanced clinical decision support systems and trustworthy AI implementation in precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.