ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning for prompt estimation of macroseismic intensity from seismometric data in Italy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After an earthquake, it is crucial to rapidly and accurately estimate macroseismic intensity to guide rescue operations and assess potential damage. The Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg intensity scale is used to qualitatively assess the ground shaking based on observed effects. This study develops a Machine Learning framework, leveraging the Random Forest algorithm, to estimate macroseismic intensity using early available seismic data. Data from different sources are used for model training: seismic data from the Italian instrumental monitoring networks of Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia and Protezione Civile, as well as macroseismic intensity data from both the online macroseismic questionnaire and the on-site surveys by field experts. In order to explain the predictive mechanism of the Random Forest algorithm, this study makes use of surrogate decision trees, providing an interpretative key for the informed decision-making process during seismic events. These models provide insights into the relationships between covariates and predicted intensities, enabling the discussion of model complexity, predictive capability, and explainability. Furthermore, the uncertainty associated with the predictions of the surrogate trees is assessed. When compared with other models for estimating intensity based on ground motion peaks or source parameters, the Random Forest model achieved better predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.