ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Text-image alignment for ILD imaging: linking CXR evidence to CT quantification.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable pulmonary fibrosis detection using edge-strengthened dilated holistic edge detection-based lung segmentation and ResNet-V2 classification.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Integrating conformal prediction with machine learning for uncertainty-aware risk stratification in coronary artery disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessment of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) relies on chest radiographs (CXR) for screening and computed tomography (CT) for definitive quantification. However, current AI pipelines typically treat these modalities in isolation, leading to report hallucinations and cross-modal inconsistencies. To address this fragmentation, we propose a framework (ARCTIC-ILD) that aligns CXR-derived textual evidence with CT-level segmentation and quantification. The system first employs a calibrated CXR evidence extractor to map radiographs to ILD-specific terminology, producing structured findings. These findings condition a terminology-to-mask module that utilizes lightweight cross-attention adapters to generate lobe-aware CT masks and burden estimates. Crucially, an explicit vision-language audit enforces consistency between the generated text and quantitative data. Evaluations on paired CXR-CT cohorts demonstrate that the framework significantly reduces text hallucination and improves phrase-to-mask alignment without incurring additional inference latency. By coupling reporting with quantification under an auditable protocol, this approach aligns with clinical workflows, serving as a robust assistant for triage, structured reporting, and longitudinal follow-up.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.