ArticleScientific reports2026
Reference gene variability across age and sex in 5XFAD mice highlights normalization challenges in Alzheimer's models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene expression profiling in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is frequently performed using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The accuracy of this technique relies heavily on selecting suitable reference genes (RGs) for normalization and internal control. Ideally, RGs should maintain consistent transcription levels, unaffected by cellular or pathological changes. However, identifying stable RGs is challenging, particularly in diseases like AD, where gene expression fluctuates across disease stages. This study aimed to determine the most stable RGs in two brain regions - cortex (CTX) and hippocampus (HIPP) - of male and female 5XFAD mice, a model of familial AD. The stability of five commonly used RGs namely Gapdh, Ppia, Rer1, Rpl27 and Rps29, was evaluated using GeNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and EndoGene algorithms across three AD stages: prodromal (2 months of age, mo), early (4 mo), and late (7 and 10 mo). Results revealed region-, sex-, and time-dependent differences in RG expression stability, reflecting the distinct vulnerability of CTX and HIPP to Aβ pathology. Using the two most stable RGs for normalization improved precision, reducing variability and increasing the significance level in target gene expression analyses. These findings emphasize the necessity of validating RGs under specific experimental conditions to ensure reliable RT-qPCR quantification in AD research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.