ArticleScientific reports2026
Research on the predicted height of water-conducting fracture zones based on the BO-RFR model and SHAP analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significant differences exist in the development height of water-conducting fracture zones (WCFZ) and their relationships with influencing factors between Carboniferous-Permian coal seams in central-eastern China and Jurassic coal seams in the western region. Utilizing 147 measured WCFZ height samples from Carboniferous-Permian seams and 111 from Jurassic seams, five influencing factors were selected: mining height, mining depth, working face slope length, hard rock ratio coefficient, and mining method. A Bayesian-optimized random forest regression model (BO-RFR) was then constructed to predict WCFZ heights, with the contributions of individual factors assessed through SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values. SHAP analysis indicated that, for Carboniferous-Permian seams, the factors influence WCFZ height in descending order as mining height, hard rock ratio coefficient, mining depth, working face slope length, and mining method. Conversely, for Jurassic seams, the ranking is mining height, mining depth, hard rock ratio coefficient, mining method, and working face slope length. This study not only validates the superior predictive capability of the BO-RFR model for WCFZ height but also systematically elucidates the differing mechanisms by which these factors impact WCFZ development across coal seams of two distinct depositional eras. The findings provide targeted theoretical support and practical decision-making guidance for the safety assessment of water-bearing coal mining in central-eastern and western mining regions of China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.