Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41639177›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Application of swarm-based deep neural networks and ensemble models for reconstruction of specific conductance data.

Amin Mahdavi-Meymand, Wojciech Sulisz, Swaroop Nandan Bora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amin Mahdavi-MeymandInstitute of Hydro-Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, Gdańsk, Poland. a.mahdavi@ibwpan.gda.pl.
Wojciech SuliszInstitute of Hydro-Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, Gdańsk, Poland.
Swaroop Nandan BoraDepartment of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, 781039, Assam, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring the specific conductance (SC) in coastal zones is vital for environmental management and sustainable development. Due to unpredictable reasons such as atmospheric conditions, mechanical problems, power outages, sensors limits, etc., recording systems may fail which causes gaps in data recording. In this study, original artificial intelligence (AI) models are developed for the modeling and reconstruction of missing SC data. Two novel swarm-based deep neural networks (DNNs)-the nonlinear group method of data handling (NGMDH) and a long short-term memory (LSTM) model integrated with the turbulent flow of water-based optimization (TFWO) algorithm were developed and applied to model SC records. The results were also compared with six conventional and two ensemble machine learning (ML) models. The efficacies of the models were evaluated in five hypothetical scenarios. Then, in the derivation phase, the best models were applied to the SC datasets comprising 5% gaps. The results highlighted the extraordinary role of AI-based models in improving knowledge on SC distribution in coastal waters. The new LSTM-TFWO and NGMDH-TFWO models, with average normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.11 and 0.11, and R² of 0.742 and 0.71, are approximately 11% and 6.36% more accurate than LSTM and NGMDH models, respectively. However, the tree-based models, with an average NRMSE of 0.05, demonstrate substantially higher accuracy than these complex DNN architectures. Among all the ML methods evaluated, ensemble models showed superior performance in reconstructing gaps in SC datasets. XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy, as indicated by an NRMSE of 0.031. Consequently, ensemble models are recommended for application in simulating various types of engineering problems.

Indexed as

Data reconstructionSpecific conductanceSwarm algorithmsXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41639177
PMCPMC12923758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.