ArticleScientific reports2026
Application of swarm-based deep neural networks and ensemble models for reconstruction of specific conductance data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring the specific conductance (SC) in coastal zones is vital for environmental management and sustainable development. Due to unpredictable reasons such as atmospheric conditions, mechanical problems, power outages, sensors limits, etc., recording systems may fail which causes gaps in data recording. In this study, original artificial intelligence (AI) models are developed for the modeling and reconstruction of missing SC data. Two novel swarm-based deep neural networks (DNNs)-the nonlinear group method of data handling (NGMDH) and a long short-term memory (LSTM) model integrated with the turbulent flow of water-based optimization (TFWO) algorithm were developed and applied to model SC records. The results were also compared with six conventional and two ensemble machine learning (ML) models. The efficacies of the models were evaluated in five hypothetical scenarios. Then, in the derivation phase, the best models were applied to the SC datasets comprising 5% gaps. The results highlighted the extraordinary role of AI-based models in improving knowledge on SC distribution in coastal waters. The new LSTM-TFWO and NGMDH-TFWO models, with average normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.11 and 0.11, and R² of 0.742 and 0.71, are approximately 11% and 6.36% more accurate than LSTM and NGMDH models, respectively. However, the tree-based models, with an average NRMSE of 0.05, demonstrate substantially higher accuracy than these complex DNN architectures. Among all the ML methods evaluated, ensemble models showed superior performance in reconstructing gaps in SC datasets. XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy, as indicated by an NRMSE of 0.031. Consequently, ensemble models are recommended for application in simulating various types of engineering problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.