Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41639169›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

DNS fingerprint based on user activity.

David Morozovič, Michal Konopa, Jan Fesl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David MorozovičDepartment of Computer Systems, Faculty of Information Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 9, Prague, 160 00, Czech Republic.
Michal KonopaDepartment of Data Sciences and Information Technology, Faculty of Agriculture and Technology, University of South Bohemia, Studentská 1668, České Budějovice, 370 05, Czech Republic.
Jan FeslDepartment of Computer Systems, Faculty of Information Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 9, Prague, 160 00, Czech Republic. fesljan@fit.cvut.cz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Domain Name System (DNS) plays a critical role in the functioning of the Internet, providing essential resolution services for nearly all user activities. In this work, we examine the hypothesis that individual users exhibit recurrent and distinctive patterns in their DNS query behavior, which can be leveraged to create unique and robust user fingerprints. Building on a publicly available dataset of real DNS traffic collected from a large-scale network, we evaluate the feasibility of user identification solely based on these behavioral DNS traces, independent of IP address stability. We conducted a comparative study of several machine learning models - including Naive Bayes, Random Forests, XGBoost, Multilayer Perceptrons, and Convolutional Neural Networks - on their ability to classify users based on domain category frequencies and derived statistical features. After extensive data preprocessing, dimensionality reduction, and feature selection, our best-performing model (CNN) achieves a classification accuracy of 86.7% across 1727 classes (unique IP addresses). The results confirm the viability of DNS-based user fingerprinting, even in the presence of dynamic IP addresses. Our approach opens new avenues for applications in network forensics and anomaly detection, while also raising important questions about privacy and ethical use of passive traffic analysis.

Indexed as

InternetBayes TheoremClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansMachine LearningBehavioral profilingDNS fingerprintingIdentificationInternet privacyUser

Identifiers

PMID41639169
PMCPMC12923842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.