ArticleScientific reports2026
Generating borderline test samples for randomness testers via intelligent optimization and evolutionary algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensuring information security heavily relies on high-quality random sequences for encryption keys. Physical entropy sources, despite their use in generating true random sequences, are susceptible to environmental disturbances, necessitating real-time randomness testing to maintain high entropy. However, existing methods for generating test data for real-time randomness testers face significant challenges, including producing sequences that fail to meet specific randomness criteria, constructing borderline sequences with slight non-randomness, and addressing the difficulty of simultaneously violating multiple randomness criteria. This paper introduces a dynamic test data generation framework designed to address these challenges. The framework leverages evolutionary algorithm (EA) to transform the generation of borderline sequences into a multi-constrained optimization problem, where a large language model (LLM) acts as a dynamic parameter adjuster. By analyzing evolutionary trends in population statistics and interacting with evolutionary dynamics through a game-theoretic mechanism, the LLM adaptively adjusts scaling factors and weight coefficients, mitigating the curse of dimensionality in multi-objective optimization and enabling real-time parameter tuning. The experimental results also highlight the high quality of the generated sequences: our approach can generate borderline test data that slightly fail to satisfy the target randomness criteria, yet exhibit statistical properties very similar to those of high-entropy sources under standard test suites. These borderline sequences are fault-detectable and provide challenging, realistic test inputs for classical statistical-test-based real-time randomness testers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.