ArticleScientific reports2026
A novel deep learning approach for mosquito species classification via a dual-head structure and calibration-aware fusion architecture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate mosquito species recognition underpins vector surveillance and targeted control, yet field imagery suffers from device variability, clutter, and fine-grained inter-species similarity. Deep learning has emerged as a scalable path, but prior systems often lack calibrated probabilities and degrade under domain shift. We propose a dual-head architecture that aligns an 8-class head with an auxiliary 8 to 2 Aedes head to sharpen difficult boundaries, and we fuse heterogeneous CNN/Transformer branches via calibrated logit stacking followed by temperature scaling (specifically, a CNN backbone paired with a Swin-T Transformer branch to capture complementary local texture and long-range morphology). With test-time augmentation (TTA, 5–8 views), the pipeline jointly reduces variance, corrects bias, and improves posterior calibration. We evaluate on AMID v1 (8-class, whole-body images) and on an unseen, phone-style Aedes corpus used strictly as test-only to probe cross-dataset generalization. Against strong baselines (ResNet-50, EfficientNet-V2-S) and naïve probability averaging, our method attains near-ceiling in-domain performance—Macro-F1 ≈ 99.3–99.4% and Micro-Accuracy ≈ 99.4–99.5%—and exceeds 99% accuracy on the unseen Aedes set, while markedly improving calibration (ECE ≈ 0.6%). Confidence intervals (Wilson, 95%) and paired tests (McNemar) indicate that these gains, though incremental, are consistent and statistically reliable. Ablations show that TTA = 5 with calibrated stacking captures most benefits at practical latency. By coupling boundary-aware supervision with calibration-aware fusion, the proposed approach delivers predictions that are both more correct and more trustworthy, stabilizing operating thresholds across sites and capture pipelines —with the Swin-T branch contributing robustness to pose and device variation through its windowed self-attention. This provides a deployment-ready baseline for public-health monitoring and a principled foundation for future extensions to open-set recognition, domain-aware calibration, and multimodal sensing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.