ArticleScientific reports2026
An IoT-based smart emotion recognition system by using internal body parameters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotion recognition using physiological signals has gained significant attention in recent years due to its potential applications in mental health monitoring, human-computer interaction, and stress management. This study focuses on recognizing six emotional states neutral, happy, sad, fear, anger, and surprise using internal body parameters such as blood pressure, oxygen saturation, blood glucose, heart rate, and body temperature. Leveraging an Internet of Things (IoT) enabled framework, real-time data was collected from participants. An exhaustive experimental assessment has been performed on 11 different classification algorithms of the machine learning platform. Among the algorithms, the Random Forest algorithm performed better than all other algorithms with 90.56% accuracy and 93.34% F1-score. Moreover, the precision and recall of the proposed system are extremely high. Model Robustness and generalization performances were evaluated by conducting internal as well as external validation. On conducting internal validation through k-fold cross-checking, the accuracy increased to 93.18%, clearly validating the consistency in the performance of the model. Further, the external validation was conducted by using the conventional DEAP emotional tasks, showing a collective accuracy of about 94% along with very good max and weighted average precision, recall, and F1-score values for all classes of emotions. This clearly validates the efficacy of the chosen physiological features as well as the correctness of the devised approach. The findings indicate that physiological signals, combined with IoT and machine learning, provide an effective framework for emotion recognition. This research contributes to the development of real-time, non-invasive emotion recognition systems, with promising applications in healthcare, wearable devices, and personalized user experiences. Future work will explore the integration of additional physiological parameters and advanced deep-learning models for enhanced accuracy and scalability, and usage in advanced technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.