ArticleScientific reports2026
Direct evaluation of the electrocardiographic spatial QRS-T angle without the need for orthogonal transformation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intra-subject covariates of QT variability indices: influence of ECG noise.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increased electrocardiogram (ECG) spatial QRS-T wave angle is a recognised risk factor. Standard evaluation of the angle requires deriving orthogonal ECG leads, either by general transformation matrices into XYZ leads or by singular value decomposition (SVD). This study shows that the transformation is not needed, and that the spatial QRS-T angle can be calculated directly from the original ECG leads. The direct computation was tested using long-term 12-lead ECGs of 523 healthy volunteers (259 females). A total of 659,313 individual 10-second ECG samples were obtained providing 7,350,733 individual beats which were analysed both by the direct method using 8 algebraically independent leads and by the conventional XYZ and SVD transformations. On average, the results of the direct non-transformation method were closer to the SVD-based results (averaged differences below 1 degree) than to the XYZ-based results (averaged differences below 2 degrees). The subject-specific regressions to the underlying heart rate showed that the proposed direct method was significantly more reproducible (p < 0.0001) and that it showed more compact variability within individual ECG samples (p < 0.0001). Thus, the study shows not only that the QRS-T angle can be computed without any orthogonal transformation but that the results of the direct computation are also more precise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.