ArticleScientific reports2026
Sustainable high-performance concrete: harnessing recycled rubber and slag for strength and eco-friendliness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a sustainable high-performance concrete (HPC) incorporating industrial by-products and recycled materials, specifically granulated blast furnace slag and recycled rubber powder, as partial replacements for cement. A series of experimental tests were conducted to evaluate the mechanical performance of the modified concrete, including compressive, flexural, and Brazilian tensile strengths, along with workability characteristics. Results indicate that replacing cement with up to 30% slag resulted in less than 5-10% reduction in mechanical strength, while significantly improving workability. The inclusion of 10% recycled rubber powder enhanced ductility and fracture energy albeit with an associated reduction in compressive strength from 89 to 73 MPa. From an environmental perspective, carbon footprint analysis revealed that cement replacement led to substantial CO₂ emission reductions, with a 42% reduction at 30% slag and up to 37% reduction at 30% rubber content compared to conventional HPC. Life cycle cost analysis further demonstrated that the mix containing 30% slag achieved the highest strength-to-cost efficiency (0.22 MPa/$), highlighting its economic viability. Overall, the findings demonstrate that combining slag and recycled rubber offers an effective pathway toward environmentally friendly and cost-efficient HPC, suitable for sustainable construction applications where reduced carbon emissions, enhanced energy absorption, and adequate structural performance are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.