ArticleScientific data2026
An EEG dataset with carbon wire loops in cognitive tasks and resting state inside and outside MR scanners.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An EEG dataset with carbon wire loops in cognitive tasks and resting state inside and outside MR scanners.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a new dataset consisting of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) collected from 39 healthy adults in their twenties to forties while performing cognitive tasks (visual oddball and N-back tasks) in addition to resting state. These tasks took place both inside and outside an MR scanner (i.e., simultaneous EEG-fMRI and EEG-only, respectively), enabling direct comparisons across the different recording environments. Moreover, a subset of the participants was in two different MRI scanners, allowing for traveling-subject analyses. In both scanners, we used EEG caps equipped with carbon wire loops to measure motion and ballistocardiogram artifacts for their subsequent removal from raw EEG signals, resulting in a dataset of superior quality compared to previous studies. All the raw data are publicly available for facilitating multimodal neuroimaging research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.