ArticleNature communications2026
Decoding efficacy and resistance space at a drug binding site.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acoziborole resistance associated mutations in Trypanosoma brucei CPSF3.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Decoding efficacy and resistance space at a drug binding site.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessing and understanding the impacts of all possible mutations at a drug binding site remain challenging. Here we use multiplex oligo targeting for mutational profiling, and computational modelling, to decode efficacy and resistance space at the otherwise native binding site for an anti-trypanosomal proteasome inhibitor. We saturation-edit twenty codons in the Trypanosoma brucei proteasome and subject the resulting libraries to stepwise drug selection and codon variant scoring, yielding dose-response profiles for >100 resistance-conferring mutants. Codon variant scores are predictive of relative resistance observed using a bespoke set of mutants, while fitness profiling reveals otherwise extensive constraints on mutational fitness and resistance space. The resistance profile is predictive of routes to spontaneous drug resistance observed within 'accessible', single nucleotide mutational space, while in silico predictions are closely aligned with impacts on drug resistance observed in cellulo. Thus, multiplex oligo targeting facilitates assessment of all possible mutations at a drug binding site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.