ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
The syndemic nexus: How vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 interact to influence vaccine uptake among university students.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in university students: Methodological insights from a syndemic perspective.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Determinants and Dynamics of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in University Students: A Machine Learning Analysis.Vaccines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined whether COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy (VH) and COVID-19-related factors interact to influence COVID-19 booster doses uptake among university students in Canada, from a syndemic perspective. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 4453 students at the University of Waterloo in 2024. VH was measured toward both COVID-19 primary and booster doses. Change in VH scores were computed to capture shifts in hesitancy over time. Logistic regression models assessed the main effects of VH and COVID-19-related factors on booster uptake. Interactions were tested using additive and multiplicative scales. Increased VH was associated with a 23% decrease in booster uptake. Younger ages, not being hospitalized due to COVID-19, not receiving the influenza vaccine, noncompliance with COVID-19 guidelines, and belief in conspiracy theories predicted lower booster uptake. Significant interactions were found between change in VH scores and COVID-19 diagnosis and hospitalization history, guideline adherence, and conspiracy beliefs. For students who did not receive booster doses, the change in VH was greater among those who reported following public health guidance than those who did not. Similarly, for students who did not receive booster doses, the change in VH was greater among those who reported not believing in conspiracy theories compared to those who did. The findings support a syndemic model, indicating that VH and COVID-19-related experiences jointly influence booster uptake. Targeted interventions such as rebuilding trust, addressing misinformation, and reducing stigma may improve booster uptake even if not all barriers are addressed. Further research is needed to examine these interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.