Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41638749›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Optimising the care pathway of febrile children via capillary C-reactive protein assay in primary care: the CRP-CAP cluster randomised stepped-wedge study protocol.

Karolina Griffiths, Mélanie Badin, Sophie Bouvet, Lou Silvente, Christophe Demattei, Chloé Sikirdji

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06910631 (Optimisation du Parcours de Soins Des Enfants fébriles Par l'Utilisation de la CRP Capillaire en Soins Primaires), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06910631 narecruitingnot on this map

Optimisation du Parcours de Soins Des Enfants fébriles Par l'Utilisation de la CRP Capillaire en Soins Primaires : Protocole d'un Essai Multicentrique randomisé

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRan2025 to 2027Enrolled420ConditionsFeverArmsCapillary CRP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karolina GriffithsDépartement Universitaire de Médecine Générale de Montpellier-Nîmes, Université de Montpellier Faculté de Médecine Montpellier-Nîmes, Montpellier, France.
Mélanie BadinDépartement Universitaire de Médecine Générale de Montpellier-Nîmes, Université de Montpellier Faculté de Médecine Montpellier-Nîmes, Montpellier, France.
Sophie BouvetCHU de Nîmes Service BESPIM, Nimes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7855-9830
Lou SilventeDépartement Universitaire de Médecine Générale de Montpellier-Nîmes, Université de Montpellier Faculté de Médecine Montpellier-Nîmes, Montpellier, France.
Christophe DematteiCHU de Nîmes Service BESPIM, Nimes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6955-9281
Chloé SikirdjiDépartement Universitaire de Médecine Générale de Montpellier-Nîmes, Université de Montpellier Faculté de Médecine Montpellier-Nîmes, Montpellier, France chloe.sikirdji@umontpellier.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1802-7984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFever is the leading reason for consultation among children in general practice. 20% of febrile children require additional tests to distinguish between viral infections and severe bacterial infections. Point of care capillary C-reactive protein (POC CRP) testing provides on-site results within 5 min but remains underutilised in primary care settings in France. This study will demonstrate how the use of POC CRP could optimise the care pathway for febrile children, saving time for physicians and patients, and making economic savings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, prospective, cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial that will take place from September 2025 to March 2026. The required sample size is estimated at 420 patients. The primary outcome is the difference in referral rates to facilities equipped for emergency laboratory testing (medical biology laboratories, emergency departments) when using POC CRP versus standard care. The study will be conducted in primary care practices and out-of-hours clinics in south France among febrile children aged 3 months to 15 years, over the 6-month viral and bacterial epidemic period. A cost-consequence analysis and a budget impact assessment will also be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Ile de France VII Committee for the Protection of Persons (2024-A02844-43), the French Advisory Board on Medical Research Data Processing and the French Personal Data Protection Authority. The study was prospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06910631.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsC-Reactive ProteinFeverPoint-of-Care TestingPrimary Health CareVirus DiseasesAdolescentCapillariesChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleFranceHumansInfantMulticenter Studies as TopicC-Reactive ProteinGeneral PracticeHEALTH ECONOMICSOrganisation of health servicesPaediatric infectious disease & immunisationPrimary Care

Identifiers

PMID41638749
PMCPMC12878500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.