ArticleBMJ open2026
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in COPD with arteriosclerosis: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Arterial stiffness, an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk, enables detection of early vascular alterations preceding major clinical outcomes, making it critical for COPD management. Pharmacotherapy currently represents a major focus of therapeutic research for arterial stiffness modulation in this population. However, while current evidence supports specific pharmacological approaches, such as statins' vascular modulation in certain subgroups, their clinical efficacy remains inconclusively demonstrated across trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To address this critical knowledge gap, we propose a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis focusing specifically on COPD patients with concomitant arterial stiffness, aiming to evaluate the efficacy of vascular-targeted pharmacotherapies (statins, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, long-acting bronchodilators). We conduct an extensive search across various databases (including MEDLINE and Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Epistemonikos, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection and China National Knowledge Infrastructure). The search will focus on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacotherapy interventions associated with concurrent arteriosclerosis in COPD patients published from the date of creation of these databases to 1 May 2025. The primary outcome will be arterial pulse wave velocity, with secondary outcomes encompassing vascular function biomarkers, COPD clinical characteristics, systemic inflammatory markers (including tumour necrosis factor-alpha), clinical remission rate and adverse events. Two independent reviewers will systematically search seven biomedical databases using validated strategies, followed by risk-of-bias assessment (Cochrane RoB 2.0) and evidence quality grading (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Subgroup analyses will be initiated contingent on identification of significant statistical heterogeneity. Stratification variables may include, but are not limited to, disease severity (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria), cumulative smoking exposure (quantified in pack-years) and comorbidity burden (eg, cardiovascular/metabolic disorders). Both conventional pairwise and network meta-analyses will be implemented to hierarchically rank therapeutic interventions and identify the optimal regimen. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review protocol is based on published RCTs and does not contain private information about the patient; therefore, ethical approval is not required. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024628739.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.