Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41638727›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

HIV testing and prevalence in fishing communities in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study of 3197 individuals within SchistoTrack.

Hanh Lan Bui, Lauren Wilburn, Salim W Nsimbe, Betty Nabatte, Geoffrey W Oromcan, Raymond Mujuni, Juma Nabonge, Narcis B Kabatereine, Adrian Smith, Goylette Chami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hanh Lan BuiBig Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5144-4433
Lauren WilburnBig Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Salim W NsimbeUganda Institute of Allied Health and Management Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Betty NabatteDivision of Vector Borne Diseases and Neglected Tropical Diseases, Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Geoffrey W OromcanPakwach District Local Government, Republic of Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Central Region, Uganda.
Raymond MujuniBuliisa District Local Government, Republic of Uganda Ministry of Health, Butiaba, Central Region, Uganda.
Juma NabongeMayuge District Local Government, Republic of Uganda Ministry of Health, Mayuge, Central Region, Uganda.
Narcis B KabatereineDivision of Vector Borne Diseases and Neglected Tropical Diseases, Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Adrian SmithNuffield Department of Population Helath, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0036-1490
Goylette ChamiBig Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK goylette.chami@ndph.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4653-0846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare HIV testing coverage, prevalence and care cascade engagement between fisherfolk and the general population, and to assess the relevance of individual and community-level definitions of fisherfolk in understanding variation in HIV status and testing.

designPrimary data collection and cross-sectional analysis in 1 year of the SchistoTrack community-based cohort.

setting52 shoreline villages in Pakwach, Buliisa and Mayuge districts in rural Uganda.

participantsA total of 3197 individuals aged 5-92 years were tested for HIV in 2024. A subset of 124 HIV-positive participants had viral load measured in 2025. Statistical analyses focused on 1931 adults aged 15 years and older. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were lifetime HIV testing, testing in the past 12 months and current HIV status. Secondary measures included self-reported care cascade outcomes and viral load suppression.

resultsOverall, 6.94% (134/1931) of adult participants aged 15 years and older were with HIV (people with HIV (PWH)), of whom 22.39% (30/134) were newly diagnosed. 6% (25/415) of adults reporting fishing activities were HIV-positive. Of those, 80% (20/25) were status-aware, 76% (19/25) were on antiretroviral therapy, and 100% (8/8) of those who knew their viral load reported viral suppression. No significant differences in care cascade engagement were found between PWH reporting fishing activities and the general population. Measured viral suppression was 70.59% (72/102) among PWH with no significant differences by fishing activities. Fishing activities were significantly associated with higher odds of ever testing for HIV (OR 1.76 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.54)), but not with testing in the past 12 months or HIV status. No consistent district-level differences were observed.

conclusionsIndividuals reporting fishing activities had higher lifetime testing and comparable HIV prevalence and care cascade engagement to the general population. Gaps remain in recent testing, status awareness and viral suppression for fisherfolk.

Indexed as

FisheriesHIV InfectionsHIV TestingMass ScreeningRural PopulationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleCommunity ParticipationEpidemiologyHIV & AIDSInfection controlPublic health

Identifiers

PMID41638727
PMCPMC12878462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.