ArticleBMJ open2026
Sex differences and associated factors of dietary diversity among older adults in Bangladesh: findings from a nationally representative cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the sex-specific status of dietary diversity (DD) and its associated factors among older men and women (aged ≥60 years) in Bangladesh.
designA nationally representative cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2018-2019 on food security, nutrition and health of older adults of both sexes.
settingData were collected from 82 clusters (rural 57, non-slum urban 15 and slum 10) from all eight administrative divisions of Bangladesh.
participantsA total of 4817 participants aged ≥60 years (2482 men and 2335 women) were enrolled. MEASURES: A list-based (24-item) recall method was employed, and the items were later aggregated into 10 food groups. The outcome variable was the prevalence of inadequate DD, defined as consumption of less than 5 food groups out of 10.
resultsMen and women had mean DD scores of 4.33±1.6 and 4.13±1.7, respectively. Women had a higher prevalence of inadequate DD than men (61.2% vs 56.3%, p=0.028). Among the food groups, women consumed significantly less fish and eggs than men (fish: 50.96% vs 57.76%, p=0.002; eggs: 17.13% vs 22.10%, p=0.004). Poor education, rural dwellings, living in homes with fewer individuals and living in food-insecure households were associated with inadequate DD in both sexes. Furthermore, among men, older age and not being currently married, and among women, lower age and living in households with middle wealth status were associated with inadequate DD.
conclusionsThe study found that older women consume relatively less diverse diets than men, and several sociodemographic factors influence inadequate DD among older adults of both sexes in Bangladesh. These factors should be considered while developing policies and programmes to promote equitable access to a diversified diet and improve geriatric health and nutritional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.